This article criticises three assumptions regarding terrorism and the agents who carry it out: (1) terrorists are always indiscriminate in their targeting; (2) terrorism is never effective in combating oppression; and (3) terrorists never participate in fair negotiations, as they merely wish to switch places with their oppressors. By criticising these three prejudices against terrorism, the article does not attempt to justify or excuse terrorism generally nor in the specific case of Sri Lanka which is examined. Instead, it creates the necessary room for such justifications or excuses to be critically appraised by dismantling some popular myths surrounding terrorism.
- Three prejudices against terrorism
- Shawn Kaplan - Adelphi University
- Critical studies on terrorism, Vol.2(2), pp.181-199
- Taylor & Francis
- 19
- Adelphi University; College of Arts and Sciences; Philosophy
- English
- Journal article
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17539150903010285
- 991004364588806266