Logo image
Adopted “mammoths” from Alaska turn out to be a whale's tale
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Adopted “mammoths” from Alaska turn out to be a whale's tale

Matthew J. Wooller, Pat Drukenmiller, Gonzalo Oteo-García, Francesca Di Paolo, Love Dalén, Nick Baker, Nancy Bigelow, Stormy Fields, Sambit Ghosh, Kathryn E. Krasinski, …
Journal of quaternary science, Vol.41(2), pp.199-206
2025

Abstract

ancient DNA Beringia mammoths stable isotopes whales Woolly mammoth—Extinction—Alaska Paleontology—Holocene Whales, Fossil—Alaska—Interior Animal remains (Archaeology)—Identification Alaska Radiocarbon Dating
Radiocarbon-dated fossils indicate woolly mammoths were extirpated from mainland Beringia around 13 000 years ago. However, environmental DNA in permafrost suggests small “cryptic“ populations survived into the Holocene. Resolving this discrepancy is crucial to understanding the drivers of mammoth extinction. The Adopt-a-Mammoth project, launched in 2022, is increasing the number of radiocarbon-dated mammoth fossils to locate the chronologically youngest specimens. Here, we report results from two “mammoth“ vertebral epiphyseal plates from interior Alaska that produced the youngest radiocarbon ages associated with mammoth specimens (~1900–2700 cal a BP). However, isotopic data indicated that these individuals consumed marine resources, and subsequent ancient DNA analysis revealed the specimens were in fact from a North Pacific Right whale and a Minke whale. Solving the mystery of recent “mammoth” fossils raised new questions. How did the remains of ancient whales become emplaced in sediment so far from the coastline? We briefly consider four scenarios to account for this.
url
Version of RecordView

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image